Scientists share emerging insights on the ‘Snowmastodon’ site

November 15, 2013, 4:20 pm
Ziegler Reservoir

A view of the re-filled Ziegler Reservoir below the Snowmass Ski Area, in July 2013 (photo courtesy

Three years ago, paleontologists were having the times of their lives, hoisting the bones of mammoths, mastodons and other now-extinct Ice Age species from the mud of a construction site near Snowmass Village as if carting off prized discoveries from a neighborhood garage sale.

In late October, some of those same scientists gathered for an afternoon in a darkened conference room in downtown Denver to share the insights they have developed after vacating the ancient lake bed in early July 2011.

Those insights won’t knock your socks off. Science can be a path small, even of doddering steps. However, as scientists synthesize the detritus of paleontological detail, a muscular story of great relevance today may yet emerge.

“It’s hard to get as excited about a squiggly line on a graph as with a mastodon femur coming out of the ground. No question,” says Jeffrey PIgati, a research geologist with the U.S. Geological Survey and team co-leader for the excavation. “But there is great information here nonetheless.”

Scientists have decided that a skeleton of a fossil deer from about 70,000 years recovered ago from Snowmass is about 10 percent larger than modern species and has a different dental arrangement, all of which argue for classification as a new species.

They continue to puzzle about placement of rocks amid mammoth bones that might suggest human presence somewhere between 40,000 and 70,0000 years ago. Also, there were parallel incisions into a bone. The result of natural, non-human processes? One expert thinks so, but not another.

“We don’t have an explanation for what this represents,” said Daniel C. Fisher, of the Museum of Paleontology and Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences at the University of Michigan.

It would be front-page news across the Americas if humans could be found in Snowmass before the start of the last advance of the glaciers. The consensus data of human arrival is 14,000 years ago, soon after the last glacial maximum. Several sites — one in Pennsylvania, another in Chile — suggest much earlier arrival of humans, but the evidence isn’t compelling.

The Snowmass evidence, intriguing though it is, also falls short of establishing humans in North America before the last glacial period.


Two tusks in the dirt below Ziegler Reservoir in October 2010, a few days after the first mammoth bones were found.

A sharper look

Researchers have gained a sharper image of the climate of Snowmass between 135,000 and 45,000 years ago through such things as tiger salamanders, pollen from trees, and other organic matter that document the past climate.

Bookends for this time, called the Sangamon Interglacial, were the giant glaciers that descended the Snowmass Creek Valley. The first of the bookends, called Bull Lake glaciation, spilled over from the valley to create the unusual lake at the top of the moraine. That glacier started retreating toward Capitol Peak and Mount Daly 130,000 years ago. Glaciers started advancing again about 40,000 years ago.

In that expanse of 90,000 years, the climate was much like our own, but not exactly so. The beginning of that interglacial period was warmer. Sea level, for example, was 6 to 8 meters (20 to 25 feet) higher than today, as glaciers of Greenland and Antarctica had significantly melted. To see the warmth documented elsewhere in the type of animals and plants at Snowmass was not surprising.


A tusk on a scale in the offices of the Snowmass Water and Sanitation District, where many of the first tusks and bones were taken after being found in October 2010 (Photo by Brent Gardner-Smith / Aspen Journalism)

35 mastodons

Bones of at least 35 mastodons, who lived during this early, warmer time, have been identified. Some 18 tusks were recovered. Tusks can reveal much about the mastodons, even to the season of the year. For being a mastodon, it wasn’t a bad time to live. They found plenty of tree leaves and branches to munch on.

But how they died — that hasn’t been explicated clearly. Earthquakes have been ruled out. There was evidence of bones being punctured and gnawed on. But by whom and what? The bones of predators usually aren’t found along lake shores, only the prey. But were there short-faced bears, giant cats and others among the Ice Age predators?

What was surprising was the extent of cold from 90,000 and 100,000 years ago. Again, the coldness had been documented elsewhere. But at Snowmass, treeline descended 2,000 to 3,000 feet as the ancient lake at Ziegler Reservoir became alpine tundra.

“We know that it was supposed to be fairly cold during that time,” says Pigati. “It’s just a lot colder than expected based, for example, on the ice cores (of Greenland and Antarctica.)”

Then, temperatures warmed again. The fossil record at Ziegler Reservoir mostly ends at about 75,000 years ago. After that, there was a general cooling until the glaciers advanced again about 40,000 years ago.

hoto courtesy Denver Museum of Nature and Science

Acrylic painting of Ziegler Reservoir landscape by Jan Vriesen, depicts about 130,000 years ago, after the formation of the lake basin by a glacier that spilled out of Snowmass Creek Valley (Photo courtesy Denver Museum of Nature and Science).

Laura Strickland, from the U.S. Geological Survey, said most of the herbs, grasses and trees for much of this interglacial period were the same as those found today: chokecherry and red raspberry, potentilla and cinquefoil, pines and conifers. White fir and limber pine were also found in Ziegler Reservoir. Today, they are not. White fir, she said, is commonly found at lower elevations or in the southern part of Colorado.

Dane Miller, a botanist from the University of Wyoming, had studied cones from conifer trees and reported 20 “exquisitely preserved specimens.”

That exceptional preservation was also highlighted in remarks by Ian Miller, chair of earth sciences and curator of paleontology at the Denver Museum of Nature & Science and the co-director for the project. “Sedge and willow leaves are often still green, beetle parts are iridescent, and cones are often found still intact,” he said.

Aside from big bones, paleontologists have always thought the greatest value of Snowmastodon, as the site was dubbed, would be its ability to record the climate of the interglacial period.

The most complete picture of life forms and hence climate is gleaned from ice cores retrieved by drilling into glaciers in Greenland and Antarctica. Those ice cores go back 800,000 years and, in the case of Greenland, even detect the arrival of Romans in the British Isles, owing to increased traces of lead, the result of smelting.

There also are many paleontological sites in North America that provide glimpses into the past. But typically they provide one or two indicators, what scientists call proxies.

Ziegler Reservoir provides a richer view. It has scores of proxies, not just or two. Others are at 3,200 feet or lower in elevation. This one is at 9,000 feet. Even the dates of individual specimens are crisp, owing to the unexpected success of a dating technique called optically stimulated luminescence. Radio-carbon dating is useless beyond 40,000 years.

“We are looking into a window back into time that we had never been able to see through before,” says Pigati.

Denver Museum of Nature & Science

This acrylic painting by Jan Vriesen depicts what the scene at Snowmass might have looked like 120,000 years ago, during the last warm period in the interlude between glaciation (Image courtesy Denver Museum of Nature & Science).

What does it show?

But what can the Snowmass excavation tell us about our own times, our climate and how we are affecting it, as most scientists now think is happening?

It’s still too soon to say. And despite the promise of Snowmastodon, those insights just may be unobtainable, said Kirk Johnson, then chief curator at the Denver Museum of Nature and Science and now director of the Smithsonian’s Museum of Natural History, at a press conference in 2011.

That’s still the case, said Miller, although he remains optimistic that insights will emerge as he and Pigati synthesize existing conclusions during the next six months.

“It could happen in the process of synthesizing the material. That’s when it usually happens,” said Miller, of the ah-hah moments.

“What you want to learn is the natural variability of the (climate) system. You want to understand how the system responds to changes in climate, whether they are large or small,” says Miller. Understanding the sensitivity of ecosystems and the responses will give us an idea of how we might expect the planet to respond in the near future as we experience global warming today.”

Listening to the sessions in Denver, Tom Cardamone of the Aspen Center for Environmental Studies heard details that were intriguing, but also sensed caution on the part of the researchers as they begin writing their reports for a special issue of the Journal of Quaternary Science. He expects more collaboration as they polish their work in coming months.

“My view is that a compelling story that is emerging, but teasing that out will be a process that will take a little more time,” says Cardamone, who has been retained to spend one day a week as executive director of Snowmass Discovery, a nascent nonprofit that aspires to tell that compelling story.

Editor’s note: This story was a collaboration between Mountain Town News and The Aspen Times. The Times published an online version of the story on Sunday, Nov. 10, 2103 and ran the story in its print edition on Monday, Nov. 11, 2013. It is printed here under Creative Common license from


The following two tabs change content below.
The Rocky Mountain Post covers science, tech, land, energy, health, outdoors, environment and real estate news from around Colorado and the intermountain West.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login